Zapier vs Make.com vs n8n vs Windmill: The Real Cost of Scaling Automation

Quick Comparison

Which Platform Is Right for You?

Take this quick quiz to find your ideal automation platform based on your technical skills, usage volume, and budget:

Real Cost at Scale: The Numbers That Matter

Here's where things get interesting. Most platforms advertise their starting price, but that number means nothing when you're running real automation at scale. Let's break down actual costs at different volumes:

The cost difference becomes staggering at scale. Running 400,000 monthly workflows on n8n costs roughly $30-60/month, while the same volume on Zapier could run $1,200-2,000+. That's a potential savings of $14,000-24,000 annually, but it comes with trade-offs we'll explore below.

Zapier: The Market Leader

What makes Zapier special

Zapier pioneered no-code automation, and it shows. The platform is polished, reliable, and incredibly easy to use. If you can click buttons, you can build Zaps.

Strengths:

• Massive integration library: 6,000+ native integrations means you rarely need custom API calls
• Zero learning curve: Non-technical teams can be productive in minutes
• Rock-solid reliability: Excellent uptime and execution consistency
• Premium support: Fast, helpful support when things break
• Polished UI: Clean, intuitive interface that just works
• Built-in error recovery: Automatic retries and good error notifications

Limitations:

• Expensive at scale: Pricing becomes prohibitive for high-volume workflows
• Linear workflow design: Complex branching logic can get messy
• Limited custom code: Code steps exist but are restrictive
• Task counting gotchas: Every action counts as a task, costs add up fast
• No self-hosting: You're completely dependent on Zapier's infrastructure
• Multi-step limitations: Complex workflows require premium plans

Real-world experience:

We started on Zapier and loved it, until our automation matured. A workflow that moved data through 5-6 steps would consume 5-6 tasks per execution. Running that 10,000 times monthly meant 50,000-60,000 tasks, pushing us into expensive tier territory fast.

Zapier excels for small teams running simple, low-volume workflows. But once you cross 25,000 tasks monthly or need complex logic, the costs force you to evaluate alternatives.

Best for:

• Small businesses and startups with simple automation needs
• Non-technical teams who need results immediately
• Organizations where ease of use justifies premium pricing
• Companies running under 10,000 tasks monthly
• Teams that value reliability and support over cost optimization

Make.com: Visual Power with Better Pricing

What makes Make.com special

Formerly Integromat, Make.com brings visual workflow design with significantly better pricing than Zapier. The canvas-based approach makes complex logic intuitive and beautiful.

Strengths:

• Visual workflow canvas: Drag-and-drop interface makes complex flows easy to understand
• Better pricing model: 2-3x cheaper than Zapier at similar volumes
• Advanced routing: Built-in support for complex branching and conditional logic
• Operations vs Tasks: Pricing model can be more favorable depending on workflow design
• Powerful data manipulation: Built-in functions for transforming data without code
• Error handling: More sophisticated error recovery than Zapier
• Scenario templates: Great library of pre-built workflows

Limitations:

• Steeper learning curve: More complex than Zapier, requires some training
• Fewer integrations: 1,500+ vs Zapier's 6,000+, though major apps are covered
• Operations can be confusing: Understanding what counts as an operation takes time
• No self-hosting: Cloud-only like Zapier
• Documentation gaps: Not as comprehensive as Zapier's docs
• UI can feel overwhelming: Feature-rich interface has more cognitive overhead

Real-world experience:

Make.com hits a sweet spot for mid-sized operations. The visual editor makes it easy to see your entire workflow at a glance, and the pricing stays reasonable as you scale. We've run workflows processing 50K+ operations monthly for around $200-300/month (half of what Zapier would cost).

The learning curve is real though. Expect a few weeks for your team to get comfortable with the interface. But once they do, productivity is excellent.

Best for:

• Teams running 10,000-100,000+ operations monthly
• Organizations with moderately complex workflows requiring branching logic
• Teams willing to invest time learning a more capable tool
• Businesses looking to reduce Zapier costs without going self-hosted
• Visual thinkers who benefit from seeing the full workflow canvas

n8n: The Self-Hosted Champion

What makes n8n special

n8n is the open-source alternative that gives you full control. Self-host it and pay only for infrastructure, with no per-task pricing. For high-volume automation, the cost savings are massive.

Strengths:

• Cost at scale: Run 400K+ workflows monthly for under $60
• Open source: Full code access, community extensions, no vendor lock-in
• Self-hosted or cloud: Choose your hosting model based on needs
• Full code support: JavaScript and Python code nodes with no restrictions
• Data sovereignty: Keep sensitive data on your infrastructure
• Advanced features: Queue mode, worker nodes, Redis integration for scale
• Active community: Regular updates, community nodes, good documentation
• Flexible database: SQLite for simple setups, PostgreSQL for scale

Limitations:

• Technical requirements: Self-hosting needs Docker, Linux, and database knowledge
• Maintenance overhead: You're responsible for updates, backups, and uptime
• Fewer pre-built integrations: 400+ nodes vs thousands on Zapier/Make
• Learning curve: More complex than cloud platforms
• Setup time: Initial configuration takes 1-8 hours depending on tier
• Support limitations: Community support unless you pay for enterprise

Real-world experience:

We run multiple n8n instances processing 300K-400K workflows monthly. The total cost? About $30/month for hosting plus $25/month for managed PostgreSQL. That's less than a basic Zapier subscription for massive scale.

The trade-off is real though. We need someone who understands Docker, databases, and Linux to manage it. Setup took about 6-8 hours for our queue mode configuration with Redis. But once running, it's been incredibly reliable.

For detailed guidance on setting up n8n at different scales, check out my n8n setup guide.

Best for:

• High-volume automation (50K+ tasks monthly)
• Teams with technical DevOps capability
• Organizations needing data sovereignty and security control
• Companies running workflows with sensitive data
• Teams comfortable with infrastructure management
• Businesses wanting to minimize long-term automation costs

Windmill: Developer-First Automation

What makes Windmill special

Windmill takes a unique approach: it's equally comfortable with visual workflows and code. Built by developers for developers, it bridges the gap between no-code automation and custom scripts.

Strengths:

• Full programming language support: TypeScript, Python, Go, Bash, SQL scripts
• Hybrid UI/code approach: Use visual editor when simple, code when complex
• Version control native: Git integration built-in, proper CI/CD workflows
• Developer experience: Full IDE-like experience with autocomplete, debugging
• Self-hosted option: Full control like n8n, with more developer-friendly tooling
• Scheduling and queuing: Built-in job queue and sophisticated scheduling
• Resource management: Credentials and secrets handled securely
• OpenAPI integration: Automatically generate workflows from API specs

Limitations:

• Developer-focused: Not ideal for non-technical teams
• Smaller community: Less mature than Zapier or n8n ecosystems
• No pre-built integrations: You build API connections yourself
• Higher learning curve: Requires coding knowledge to unlock full potential
• UI less polished: Functional but not as refined as established platforms
• Documentation gaps: Newer platform means less community content

Real-world experience:

Windmill excels when you need automation that talks to custom APIs or requires complex logic. Instead of fighting with limited no-code functions, you just write TypeScript or Python. The ability to version control everything in Git is huge for engineering teams.

Pricing is reasonable (similar to Make.com at scale) but with far more flexibility. If your team has developers, Windmill can handle things that would be painful or impossible on traditional automation platforms.

Best for:

• Engineering teams building internal tools and automation
• Organizations with custom APIs requiring complex integration logic
• Teams wanting version control and CI/CD for automation
• Companies needing more power than no-code offers but wanting some visual tooling
• DevOps teams managing infrastructure automation
• Organizations running data pipelines and ETL processes

Hidden Costs You Need to Consider

Subscription fees are just the beginning. Here are the real costs that catch people by surprise:

Time Investment

• Learning curve: Zapier takes hours, n8n takes days, Windmill takes weeks for full proficiency
• Workflow development: Complex automation can take 10-40 hours to build properly
• Testing and debugging: Expect 20-30% additional time for thorough testing
• Documentation: Good documentation saves countless support hours later

Maintenance Overhead

• API changes: Third-party APIs change; workflows break
• Platform updates: Self-hosted options need manual updates
• Monitoring: Someone needs to watch for failures and fix them
• Backup management: Critical workflows need backup strategies

Infrastructure Costs

• Server hosting: n8n needs $6-60/month depending on scale
• Database costs: PostgreSQL hosting adds $0-25/month
• Redis for queue mode: Another $10-20/month at scale
• Backup storage: Off-site backups cost $5-20/month

Team & Training

• Onboarding time: New team members need training
• Technical expertise: Self-hosted options need DevOps skills
• Support burden: Internal team supports automation infrastructure
• Context switching: Managing automation takes focus from other priorities

Opportunity Costs

The biggest hidden cost is what you could be building instead. Spending 40 hours setting up self-hosted infrastructure means not spending 40 hours on core product work. Sometimes paying for a managed solution is cheaper when you factor in what your team could accomplish with that time.

Decision Framework: Which Platform Is Right for You?

Use this framework to evaluate platforms based on your situation:

Choose Zapier if:

• You're running under 10,000 tasks monthly
• Your team is non-technical and needs immediate results
• You value ease of use and support over cost optimization
• You need obscure integrations that only Zapier supports
• Budget isn't your primary constraint

Choose Make.com if:

• You're running 10,000-100,000 operations monthly
• Your workflows have complex branching and conditional logic
• You want better pricing than Zapier but aren't ready to self-host
• Your team can invest time learning a more powerful interface
• Visual workflow design helps your team understand automation

Choose n8n if:

• You're running 50,000+ tasks monthly and costs are significant
• You have technical team members comfortable with Docker and databases
• Data sovereignty and security are important
• You want to minimize long-term automation costs
• Your workflows need custom code or complex logic
• You're willing to manage infrastructure for massive cost savings

Choose Windmill if:

• Your team has strong development capabilities
• You're building automation that interfaces with custom APIs
• Version control and CI/CD for automation is important
• You need the flexibility to use real programming languages
• You're building internal tools and data pipelines
• Your workflows require complex logic that's easier in code

Migration Strategies

Switching platforms is painful but sometimes necessary. Here's how to do it without disrupting operations:

Zapier to Make.com

• Difficulty: Moderate
• Timeline: 1-2 weeks for most organizations
• Strategy: Rebuild workflows one at a time, run in parallel during testing
• Gotchas: Operations counting works differently; test thoroughly

Zapier/Make to n8n

• Difficulty: Hard
• Timeline: 2-4 weeks including infrastructure setup
• Strategy: Set up n8n infrastructure first, migrate high-volume workflows first to justify setup cost
• Gotchas: Some integrations require custom API work; plan extra time

Any platform to Windmill

• Difficulty: Very Hard
• Timeline: 4-8 weeks depending on complexity
• Strategy: Requires rewriting workflows as code; treat it as a development project
• Gotchas: No automated migration tools; everything is manual

Migration Best Practices

• Document workflows before migrating (you'll be surprised what you forgot)
• Start with non-critical workflows to learn the new platform
• Run old and new workflows in parallel for 1-2 weeks minimum
• Build monitoring and alerting from day one on the new platform
• Keep the old platform active for 1-2 months as backup
• Budget 30-50% more time than you think it will take

My Recommendations

After managing automation across all these platforms, here's my practical advice:

For most small teams (under 10K tasks/month):

Start with Zapier. Yes, it's pricier, but the time savings and ease of use are worth it when you're building your first automations. Focus on learning what to automate, not how platforms work.

For growing teams (10-50K tasks/month):

Switch to Make.com. The pricing is reasonable, the visual editor is powerful, and you're not yet at the scale where self-hosting makes financial sense. The learning curve is manageable, and you'll save thousands annually.

For high-volume operations (50K+ tasks/month):

Migrate to n8n. The cost savings become massive at this scale. A $30-60/month infrastructure bill vs $300-600+/month on SaaS platforms is a no-brainer if you have the technical capability. The ROI on learning n8n is immediate.

For developer teams building internal tools:

Consider Windmill. If your team writes code anyway, Windmill gives you the best of both worlds: visual workflows for simple tasks, full programming power for complex ones. The version control integration alone is worth it for engineering teams.

My Current Setup:

We run a hybrid approach:

• n8n (self-hosted): High-volume workflows, 300-400K executions monthly, $30-60/month
• n8n (cloud): Quick test workflows and client-specific automation, $24/month
• Windmill: Developer-focused workflows and custom integrations
• Make.com: Legacy workflows (actively phasing out due to cost)

This hybrid approach gives us flexibility while minimizing costs. We're migrating remaining Make.com workflows to n8n and Windmill to further reduce expenses. Total monthly spend: around $100-200 for workflows that would cost $1,000+ on Zapier.

Final Thoughts

The best automation platform isn't the cheapest or the most feature-rich. It's the one that matches your team's capabilities and scale. Start simple, monitor your costs and complexity, and migrate when the current platform's limitations or costs become painful.

Don't over-optimize early. A $50/month Zapier bill that saves 10 hours of your time is a fantastic investment. But a $600/month Zapier bill when n8n could do it for $30 is wasteful. Let scale and pain points guide your decisions, not just initial pricing.

Want more automation insights?

Follow me on LinkedIn for more practical tips on workflow automation, system integration, and building efficient processes. I regularly share lessons learned from managing automation at scale across multiple platforms.